Pre-action Protocol for Personal Injury

(Civil Procedure Rules 1999)

Introduction

In April 1999 the civil claim procedure known as Legal Aid was replaced by the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR). These are also sometimes known as The Woolf Reforms because they were instigated by Lord Woolf, the then Master of the Rolls.

The main aim of CPR is to speed up the whole pre-trial process and, by its very nature, increases the likelihood of a case being settled out of court. A solicitor will only get paid at the end of a case, which he has to win, so it eliminates “no hope” cases. By only taking on cases with a strong likelihood of winning (and therefore being paid) it is in the solicitor’s interests to speed things along. Cases that do go to court will also be dealt with more quickly.

The Overriding Objective Of Civil Procedure Rules

1. To ensure that all parties are on an equal footing.
2. To save unnecessary expense.
3. To deal with the case in ways that are proportionate to:
   • The amount of money involved.
   • The importance of the case.
   • The complexity of the issues.
   • The financial position of each party.
4. To ensure that it is carried out speedily and quickly.
5. To allocate an appropriate share of court resources.

Part 36 (Civil Procedure Rules)

Before a case goes to court, a defendant’s solicitor may make a financial offer. Under Part 36 of the CPR this offer is made without admitting liability, or without prejudice, and it cannot be disclosed. The claimant’s solicitor must advise his client whether or not to accept the offer by comparing similar settlements in like cases.

If the claimant ignores his solicitor’s advice and continues with court proceedings he will not be covered by the terms and conditions of the Conditional Fee Agreement (explained in another essay).If the judge later finds in favour of the claimant and makes an award which is the same amount or less (even by £1) than made in the without prejudice offer, the claimant will have to pay all costs out of his award. In other words, the claimant’s award in court would have to be greater than the without prejudice offer in order to make the defendant pay costs.

Pre-Action Protocols

Pre- Action Protocol is defined as taking action without using a solicitor or lawyer. As an investigator, this is most likely to happen when a friend who has had a personal injury accident asks your opinion on whether he has a case. (He may have already been rejected by a solicitor). If, after studying the case, you believe he may have a claim, you can instigate procedures which will enable you to acquire details of relevant records from the organisation or company that the claimant holds liable.

For a work related accident, this would allow you to request details of the friend’s employment, training and Health and Safety records (as in Wallace v Nth Cambs). For a Slip/Trip as in the case of Wilson v Megastores, you would be instigating procedures against Megastores Supermarket and requesting details relevant to their Health and Safety and training records. If the Slip/trip was against a council, (as in the case of Beryl Sharpe, Module 2 page 39) you would write to them requesting records relating to Highways Inspections and maybe Customer Relations letters and/or telephone logs. You must, however, explain to your friend the way CPR and Part 36 works so that he fully understands that he may be ultimately liable for costs. If his case has already been rejected by a solicitor, proceeding with litigation is a big risk.

Letter Of Claim

If you were to become involved in a pre-action protocol, the first thing you must do is send a Letter of Claim to the person or company you hold responsible, (see my work on Wallace v Nth Cambs). This letter is addressed to the defendant and must include full details of the claimant – full name, address, works number or National Insurance number and the name and address of the claimant’s employer. The letter must then state the type of accident and the date and place it occurred. Details of the defendant’s insurers are requested. A brief outline of the accident is given, then a simple explanation of why the defendant is deemed to be at fault. A description of the claimant’s injuries follows, with details of where he received treatment. Next is a statement of the claimant’s occupation, time off work and income details. If the letter is addressed to the employers then a request could be made for details of earnings. If a police report is applicable (for a RTC) you would offer a copy upon payment of half the fee. If another party is involved you would attach a copy of the Letter of Claim sent to them, and state their name, address and insurance details.

The next part of the letter requests documents relevant to the case which are already likely to be held by the defendant. From the standard disclosure list you would name which documents were required for that particular claim, and this may vary depending on the type of claim. For a work related claim such as Wallace v Nth Cambs you would request parts (i) to (x) from the list:

1. Accident book entry
2. First Aider report
3. Surgery record
4. Foreman/supervisor accident report
5. Safety representative’s accident report
6. RIDDOR report to HSE
7. Other communications between defendants and HSE
8. Minutes of Health and Safety Committee meeting(s) where accident/matter considered
9. Report to DSS
10. Documents listed above relative to any previous accident/matter identified by the claimant and relied upon as proof of negligence.

For a highway tripping claim such as Whyte v SKDC you would name parts (iii) and (vi) to (x). For a road traffic accident such as Mejer v Dumfries and Galloway, parts (iii) and (vi) to (x) would apply.

The final part of the Letter of Claim requests the production of documents which comply with specific regulations relating to statutory legislation. For a work related claim, as in Wallace v Nth Cambs, the defendant could be asked to produce documents relating to;

• The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1992
• The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1992
• Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992
• Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992

Each of the above regulations would detail the particular section and/or sub-section which applies. (See Module 4 page 79). A work accident in an office environment would not necessarily request documentation relating to regulations concerning personal protective equipment or manual handling. Each letter of claim would have to be individually tailored to the specific incident and claimant.

The letter would close with a request for acknowledgement within 21 days from the defendant or their insurers. You would include a copy for forwarding on to their insurance company.

Following the Letter of Claim a set procedure must be adhered to and is as follows:

• Letter of claim is sent to the defendant with a request to respond within 21 days. If no response, the claimant can instigate legal proceedings, but must have a medical report prepared together with a list of losses incurred.
• If the defendant has responded within 21 days, the claimant must allow the defendant 3 months to investigate the claim. During this time the claimant must continue to make his own investigations; (you the investigator can do this on his behalf).
• After 3 months, if the defendant does not admit liability you try and agree a settlement through a Part 36 offer (without prejudice).
• If no settlement is agreed you ask again for a Part 36 offer. If there is still no offer you must now involve a solicitor who will instigate legal proceedings by filing and serving a claim form and Particulars of Claim. (See previous work submitted on Wallace v Nth Cambs and note below).

Particulars Of Claim

This document is issued by a solicitor when no settlement has been possible under a Part 36 offer. It is a short statement of the claim being made and outlines the relevant Health and Safety Regulations that have been breached. This is sent to the defendant with a full report of the incident (which has been carried out by you, the investigator).

Conclusion

As an investigator you have no right of audience in court, so if the claimant chooses to proceed you have no choice but to involve a lawyer. However you may claim the referral fee and payment for the work. You should enter into a contract for either a set fee or a commission (a percentage of the compensation the claimant receives from the defendant). You could ask the claimant to sign an agreement which instructs the defendant to pay the compensation directly to you. You then deduct your fee and send the balance to the claimant.