Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

National Phonograph Company v Edison

314 words (1 pages) Case Summary

16th Jul 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

National Phonograph Co Ltd v Edison Bell Co Ltd [1908] 1 Ch. 335

Tort – Inducing breach of contract and fraud – Interference with Contractual Relation – Violation of Legal Right – Damages

 

Facts:

The plaintiffs were manufacturers who sold wholesale goods to factors upon the terms of an agreement which provided that only factors who had signed the agreement could sell the plaintiff’s goods. The goods also had to be sold at a fixed price. The defendant company employed other defendants, to obtain the plaintiff’s goods from other factors who were signatories to the agreement, by fraudulently holding themselves to be independent dealers. The purchasers who had fallen victim to fraud and suffered loss as a result.

Issues:

Whether the transaction between the defendant and the factors gave the plaintiffs any cause of action against the defendant company.

Held:

Held, upon affirming the appeal it was found that the plaintiffs were entitled to an injunction and damages in respect of the transactions between the defendant company and the factors. The defendant company was found to have committed fraud and therefore, induced the factors to sell the retailer’s goods to them. Had they approached the factors without the use of fraud, they would have unlikely been able to sell the goods, as the factors knew the penalties for breaching their contracts. The actions of the defendant were unlawful and were deliberate. The defendant would have been aware that the action would cause loss to the plaintiff. The defendants had interfered without justification with the contractual relations existing between the plaintiffs and the factors, thereby causing damage to the plaintiffs.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles