• Order
  • Offers
  • Support
    • Monday 30th December: 08:00 - 21:00 Tuesday 31st December: 09:00 - 13:00 Wednesday 1st January: Closed Thursday 2nd: 08:00 - 21:00 You can still place orders while we’re closed, and we’ll process them as soon as we reopen. Thank you for choosing us, and we wish you a happy and successful New Year!

      December 30, 2024

  • Sign In

Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Jones v Challenger

266 words (1 pages) Case Summary

17th Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Jones v Challenger [1961] 1 QB 176

The effect of extinction of the purpose of a trust to provide a matrimonial home on a joint tenant’s right to seek an order of sale.

Facts

A married couple held joint legal and equitable title to a piece of property which had served as their matrimonial home. Upon the disintegration of the relationship, the wife wanted to sell their matrimonial home. The husband attempted to assert his right as a beneficiary of the joint trust on which they held the property to prevent the sale. Subsequently the wife sought an order of sale from the Court to enable her to sell the property without her husband’s consent as a beneficiary of the property and trust.

Issues

Whether the couple’s divorce extinguished the joint trust of the property (given its purpose as the matrimonial home) and thus negating the husband’s right to prevent sale on the grounds of equity.

Decision/Outcome

The Court found for the wife, deeming that an order of sale could be reasonably issued despite the husband’s protest as the purpose of the joint trust regarding the property had been to provide a matrimonial home and as the trustees had divorced, this purpose was no longer existent. With the extinction of the trust’s purpose, there was a presumption that a sale could be order as per a trust for sale. Had the couple still been married, the husband’s beneficial interest in the property would have been considered differently as the trust’s purpose would be ongoing.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles