Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority

370 words (1 pages) Case Summary

1st Oct 2021 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Legal Case Summary

Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1998] AC 232

TORT – NEGLIGENCE – STANDARD OF CARE FOR MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS – CAUSATION

Facts

A child was brought to a hospital suffering from breathing abnormalities. The doctor summoned to deal with the matter never received the summons due to a low battery on her bleep. The child died as a result. The child’s mother sued for negligence, arguing that the child should have been seen and intubated.

Issues

Establishing the tort of negligence involves establishing that the defendant breached their duty of care to the claimant. The case of Bolam v Friern Hospital had established that professionals will not be in breach of their duty if they acted in accordance with practices accepted as proper by a responsible body of other medical professionals with relevant expertise. In addition, the claimant must show that but for the breach, the harm would not have arisen (causation).

The doctor testified that they would not have intubated the patient even if they had attended, and an expert witness agreed this was proper. The issue is whether this satisfied the Bolam test, and whether causation was established.

Decision/Outcome

No liability.

The House of Lords held that it is not possible for a defendant to argue that a breach did not cause the harm, because but for the breach, some other breach would have been committed. As such, it was necessary to assess whether the doctor would have been in breach if they had attended and not intubated the child.

The House of Lords clarified the Bolam test to include a proviso that the practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of professionals must be based on logical and defensible grounds.

In this case, refusing to intubate the child was not illogical, and so there was no breach.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles