Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Any information contained in this act summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Terrorism Acts Summary 2000 & 2006

1371 words (5 pages) Act

7th Jun 2019 Act Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

A late 20th century snapshot of terrorism in the UK reveals a recently ended IRA ceasefire in 1996, the deaths of two people as a result of the Canary Wharf bomb, 200 people injured in Manchester city centre and a recommendation from Lord Lloyd of Berwick regarding a permanent anti-terrorism law to replace temporary statutes applicable mainly to Northern Ireland.[1] The outcome was the Terrorism Act 2000, (TA 2000) with seven parts, sixteen schedules and 300 pages.[2] The TA 2000 was an amalgamation of much of the Northern Irish legislation but given a broader application.

The TA 2000 adopted a very wide definition of terrorism, which focuses on both the motivations of terrorist conduct as well as its methods.[3] It includes not only violence against persons by “serious damage to property”.[4] It has been criticised for being “sweepingly broad and extraordinarily vague”.[5]Another controversial aspect of the TA 2000 was the authority of a senior police officer to authorise the use of blanket stop and searches within a specified geographical area under section 44 and renewable for up to 28 days.[6] There was no requirement for police to have grounds for suspecting terrorist activity; powers were to be used to search for articles connected with terrorism.[7] Evidence suggests that ethnic minorities were effected disproportionality by these powers. In the months that followed the 2005 London bombings there was a twelvefold increase in the stop and searches of black and Asian people in London, compared to a fivefold increase in white people.[8]

Powers under section 44 have since been repealed; however, powers to stop, examine and detain travellers by air and sea under Schedule 7 remain.[9] A new section 47A was implemented after section 44 was found to infringe the right to a private and family life under Article 8 ECHR[10][11] The TA 2000 also includes anomalies such a three months prison sentence for a breach of a police cordon around a package suspected of being terrorism-related[12] and a sentence of one month for a similar breach when the package is suspect but not terrorism-related.[13]

The Terrorism Act 2006 (TA 2006) was passed in response to the London bombings of 2005.[14] It was characterised with the “panic filled retreat from human rights laws” typical of anti-terrorism legislation.[15] The TA 2006 extended the length of time that a terror suspect could be detained without charge[16] and introduced measures that curtailed freedom of expression.[17] As a counter measure, an independent review of terrorism was also introduced via the TA 2006.[18] Further measures were introduced with the criminalisation of preparatory acts of terrorism; many individuals may not be involved in the terrorist acts themselves, or any part of a conspiracy, but it covers those sending equipment to fighters in Afghanistan.[19] The TA 2006 further elaborates on acts of terrorism by creating offences of publication or dissemination of terrorist publications.[20] Finally, the TA 2006 also creates an offence of attending a location that is known to be used for the training of terrorists, regardless of why the person is actually there.[21]

Bibliography

i. Cases

Gillan and Quinton v United Kingdom (Application no 4158/05)

R(Kurdistan Workers Party) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept [2002] EWHC 644

ii. Legislation

European Convention of Human Rights 1953

Terrorism Act 2000

Terrorism Act 2006

iii. Books/Articles

Alder, J., Constitutional and Administrative Law (Palgrave MacMillan, 2015)

Anderson, D. QC, Shielding the compass: how to fight terrorism without defeating the law (2013) 3 European Human Rights Law Review, 233-246

McKeever, D., The Human Rights Act and anti-terrorism in the UK: one great leap forward by Parliament, but are the courts able to slow the steady retreat that has followed (2010) Jan, Public Law, 110-139

Moeckli, D., Stop and Search Under the Terrorism Act 2000: A Comment on R(Gillan) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (2007) 70(4) The Modern Law Review, 659-669,

iv. Online

Anderson, D.  Report on the Operation in 2010 of the Terrorism Acts 2000 and 2006, July 2011, para.6.14.

[online] accessed 29th January 2016

v. Newspaper

Dodd,V. ‘Surge in Stop and Search of Asian People after July 7’, The Guardian 24 December 2005.


[1]David Anderson QC, Shielding the compass: how to fight terrorism without defeating the law (2013) 3 European Human Rights Law Review, 233-246, p.233

[2] ibid p.234

[3]David McKeever, The Human Rights Act and anti-terrorism in the UK: one great leap forward by Parliament, but are the courts able to slow the steady retreat that has followed (2010) Jan, Public Law, 110-139, p.115

[4] Section 1 Terrorism Act 2000

[5] Richards J in R(Kurdistan Workers Party) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept [2002] EWHC 644

[6]Daniel Moeckli, Stop and Search Under the Terrorism Act 2000: A Comment on R(Gillan) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (2007) 70(4) The Modern Law Review, 659-669, p.659

[7] Section 45(1)(a) Terrorism Act 2000

[8] V. Dodd, ‘Surge in Stop and Search of Asian People after July 7’The Guardian 24 December 2005.

[9] Anderson, supra n.1, p.238

[10]Gillan and Quinton v United Kingdom (Application no 4158/05)

[11] European Convention of Human Rights 1953

[12] Section 3 Terrorism Act 2000

[13]D. Anderson, Report on the Operation in 2010 of the Terrorism Acts 2000 and 2006, July 2011, para.6.14.

[online] accessed 29th January 2016

[14] John Alder, Constitutional and Administrative Law (Palgrave MacMillan, 2015) p.577

[15] ibid

[16] Section 23 Terrorism Act 2006

[17] Sections 1-3 Terrorism Act 2006

[18] Section 36 Terrorism Act 2006

[19] Section 5 Terrorism Act 2006

[20] Sections 1-2 Terrorism Act 2006

[21] Section 8 Terrorism Act 2006

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

Related Content

Jurisdictions / Tags

Content relating to: "UK Law"

UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Essays, case summaries, problem questions and dissertations here are relevant to law students from the United Kingdom and Great Britain, as well as students wishing to learn more about the UK legal system from overseas.

Related Articles